The case studies discussed in this blog post offer valuable lessons for navigating the complexities of cross-border IP disputes and protecting intellectual property in an increasingly interconnected world.

EU courts can now hear cases involving the infringement of foreign IP rights, including copyrights, trademarks, and designs, provided the defendant is domiciled in an EU Member State.

The outcomes of these disputes can set precedents that affect future innovation strategies and IP enforcement across industries. This paper explores the intricacies of cross-border patent disputes in …

May 15, 2025 · The CJEU’s decision in case C-339/22 clarifies jurisdiction rules in cross-border IP disputes: national courts may decide on infringement issues even if the validity of the IP right is …

Mar 24, 2025 · In its landmark judgement of 25 February 2025, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) clarifies the rules on jurisdiction in cross-border IP disputes in which both infringement and validity …

Apr 8, 2025 · The CJEU's decision in case C-339/22 clarifies jurisdiction rules in cross-border IP disputes. National courts can decide on infringement issues even if the validity of the IP right is …

Mar 19, 2024 · In this blog post, we will delve into the most recent developments in this dynamic field, highlighting landmark cases, key legislative changes, and offering practical insights for businesses …

Mar 6, 2025 · The decision strengthens the relevance of EU-based courts in global patent litigation and underscores the need for cross-border strategies.

This paper aims to analyze cross-border IP disputes, their difficulties, and ways and means by which the risks can be effectively managed and IP protection achieved at the international level.

Real-world case studies—such as Apple vs. Samsung, Huawei, and Moderna—illustrate the fragmented and often contentious terrain of international IP litigation.